Recently I’ve been thinking about how I describe the Volunteer work I do to others. I mainly use the word ‘unpaid’ instead of the word ‘volunteer’. My reasoning is that the minute I describe the work I do as Voluntary people seem to view it less favourably than my paid work.
I would be interested to know your thoughts on the following:
- I s Volunteering undervalued?
- If the Voluntary sector put greater emphasis on the more skilled work their Volunteers did would this help?
- Do we need to make the image of Volunteer work more professional? What would this mean? Pros and Cons? Would this increase the value society places on Voluntary work?
- Do we need to view and hear more stories about the work Volunteers do e.g. in newspapers, on the web, in magazines? Would this change perceptions of ideas about what Volunteers do and how the Volunteers themselves perceive their work?
- If Voluntary work was held in higher esteem by society what would this mean for the sector? Would Volunteers be easier to attract?
- Is there a particular stigma or perception about board/committee work? Is this partly why these positions are difficult to fill?
I look forward to some great discussion on this topic.
Cindy
Posted by cindycarmichael
Posted by cindycarmichael
Posted by volcan